NOTE: To view the training dates and registration button clearly put your mobile phone, tablet on landscape layout. Thank you
| Training Mode | Platform | Fee | Enroll |
|---|---|---|---|
| Online Training | Zoom/ Google Meet | 1,740USD | Register |
| Course Date | Location | Fee | Enroll |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2026 to 18/09/2026 | Nairobi | 2,900 USD | Register |
| 07/09/2026 to 18/09/2026 | Mombasa | 3,400 USD | Register |
| 05/10/2026 to 16/10/2026 | Nairobi | 2,900 USD | Register |
| 02/11/2026 to 13/11/2026 | Mombasa | 3,400 USD | Register |
| 02/11/2026 to 13/11/2026 | Nairobi | 2,900 USD | Register |
| 07/12/2026 to 18/12/2026 | Nairobi | 2,900 USD | Register |
| 07/12/2026 to 18/12/2026 | Mombasa | 3,400 USD | Register |
Course Introduction
Public institutions can experience periods of declining performance caused by financial pressures, weak leadership, fragmented accountability, outdated processes, capability gaps, ineffective governance, changing demand, failed programmes, or external shocks. When deterioration is not diagnosed and addressed early, operational weaknesses can become systemic and undermine public confidence. This course equips leaders with practical approaches for diagnosing institutional distress, stabilizing performance, and building sustainable recovery.
Advanced Public Institution Turnaround and Performance Recovery Training Course provides a structured methodology for understanding why institutional performance deteriorates and how executives can lead recovery under difficult conditions. Participants will examine organizational health, financial sustainability, operational effectiveness, workforce capability, governance, service performance, stakeholder confidence, risk exposure, and strategic alignment. The emphasis is on evidence-based diagnosis followed by prioritized interventions that can produce visible and sustainable improvements.
Successful turnaround requires leaders to distinguish symptoms from underlying causes. Participants will learn how to conduct institutional diagnostics, identify critical performance constraints, assess organizational dependencies, analyze cost and productivity pressures, and determine which interventions should receive immediate attention. They will explore stabilization techniques for urgent problems while developing longer-term recovery strategies that address structural weaknesses rather than relying on temporary fixes.
The programme also examines the human and leadership dimensions of performance recovery. Turnaround environments can generate uncertainty, resistance, fatigue, political pressure, workforce anxiety, and stakeholder concerns. Participants will develop approaches for communicating the case for change, mobilizing leadership teams, clarifying accountability, managing resistance, protecting critical capabilities, and maintaining service continuity while reforms are implemented.
Modern institutional recovery increasingly depends on data, digital transformation, process redesign, automation, artificial intelligence, analytics, and continuous performance monitoring. Participants will consider how these capabilities can accelerate diagnosis and recovery while recognizing risks involving poor data, technology dependency, cybersecurity, privacy, algorithmic bias, implementation capacity, and change saturation. Emerging pressures such as fiscal constraints, climate-related disruption, demographic change, and evolving citizen expectations are also incorporated into the recovery framework.
The course culminates in a practical institutional turnaround and performance recovery plan. Participants will learn to establish a performance baseline, identify root causes, prioritize interventions, define recovery targets, allocate resources, establish governance, monitor leading indicators, and institutionalize improvements. The ultimate objective is to help public leaders move institutions from deterioration and reactive management toward stability, resilience, operational excellence, stronger accountability, and sustainable public value.
10 days
Chief executives, directors-general, permanent secretaries, commissioners, and senior leaders responsible for institutional recovery and performance improvement.
Executive directors and departmental heads leading organizations experiencing performance, financial, operational, governance, or service-delivery challenges.
Strategy, transformation, organizational-development, and institutional-effectiveness directors responsible for major recovery initiatives.
Finance directors, chief financial officers, budget executives, and resource-management leaders addressing fiscal pressures and cost inefficiencies.
Operations and service-delivery executives responsible for restoring productivity, quality, reliability, and service performance.
Performance management, monitoring, evaluation, and delivery leaders responsible for identifying performance deterioration and tracking recovery.
Risk, governance, compliance, internal audit, and assurance professionals supporting institutional diagnostics and recovery interventions.
Human-resource executives managing workforce capability, productivity, restructuring, morale, leadership capacity, and organizational change.
Programme and portfolio executives responsible for turnaround programmes, transformation initiatives, restructuring, and strategic recovery projects.
Policy and reform advisers supporting government institutions through organizational restructuring, performance improvement, or institutional renewal.
Digital transformation and technology leaders implementing systems, analytics, automation, and technology-enabled performance recovery.
Public-sector consultants and organizational-development specialists conducting institutional health assessments and turnaround programmes.
Local-government chief officers and senior managers responsible for recovering financial, operational, or service-delivery performance.
Senior managers overseeing critical functions where persistent performance gaps require coordinated executive intervention.
Emerging public-sector executives preparing to lead complex institutional recovery, restructuring, transformation, and performance-improvement programmes.
Develop advanced capabilities for diagnosing institutional distress, performance decline, operational weaknesses, financial pressures, governance gaps, and organizational health challenges.
Apply structured turnaround methodologies to stabilize critical services, address urgent performance problems, protect essential capabilities, and establish recovery priorities.
Distinguish symptoms, immediate causes, root causes, structural constraints, external pressures, and management weaknesses when diagnosing institutional performance problems.
Conduct comprehensive organizational diagnostics covering strategy, governance, finance, operations, workforce, technology, risk, service delivery, and stakeholder confidence.
Develop evidence-based recovery strategies that prioritize interventions according to urgency, impact, feasibility, dependencies, resource requirements, and institutional capacity.
Strengthen executive decision-making during turnaround situations where leaders face incomplete information, competing priorities, limited resources, public scrutiny, and pressure for rapid results.
Apply financial and operational analysis to identify cost drivers, productivity gaps, resource inefficiencies, service constraints, underperformance, and opportunities for sustainable recovery.
Design performance recovery frameworks using leading and lagging indicators, milestones, accountability structures, escalation mechanisms, and executive review routines.
Lead organizational change during difficult recovery periods by managing resistance, communicating priorities, sustaining workforce engagement, and protecting critical institutional capabilities.
Use analytics, automation, process improvement, artificial intelligence, and digital technologies responsibly to accelerate diagnosis, intervention, monitoring, and performance recovery.
Establish governance and assurance arrangements that maintain accountability, manage recovery risks, monitor intervention effectiveness, and prevent recurrence of institutional weaknesses.
Develop an integrated turnaround plan with measurable recovery outcomes, prioritized initiatives, resource requirements, governance arrangements, implementation milestones, and sustainability mechanisms.
Understanding institutional turnaround as a structured process for stabilizing performance, addressing root causes, restoring capability, and creating sustainable organizational recovery.
Examining common causes of public-institution decline, including weak governance, financial pressures, poor strategy execution, operational inefficiency, capability gaps, and external disruption.
Differentiating turnaround, recovery, restructuring, transformation, continuous improvement, crisis management, and organizational renewal according to their objectives and intervention requirements.
Establishing turnaround principles that balance urgency, public accountability, service continuity, workforce considerations, evidence, political realities, and long-term institutional sustainability.
Establishing a comprehensive institutional performance baseline covering strategic results, operational efficiency, financial health, service quality, workforce capability, and organizational resilience.
Identifying performance deterioration through trends, benchmarks, stakeholder feedback, financial indicators, operational data, risk signals, and service-delivery evidence.
Distinguishing isolated performance problems from systemic institutional weaknesses that require executive-level intervention and coordinated recovery action.
Developing diagnostic hypotheses and evidence-gathering approaches that enable leaders to test assumptions and identify the most consequential causes of underperformance.
Assessing organizational health across leadership, culture, structure, capabilities, processes, resources, technology, accountability, workforce, and management practices.
Applying root-cause analysis to determine how underlying structural, behavioural, financial, technological, governance, and operational factors contribute to performance decline.
Identifying reinforcing cycles where weak performance, declining morale, resource constraints, service problems, and stakeholder dissatisfaction intensify one another.
Prioritizing root causes according to their systemic significance, reversibility, urgency, controllability, and potential effect on institutional recovery.
Diagnosing financial pressures through expenditure analysis, revenue trends, budget performance, cost structures, resource allocation, liabilities, and long-term fiscal sustainability.
Identifying opportunities to reduce waste, improve productivity, redesign services, optimize procurement, and redirect resources toward high-priority institutional outcomes.
Balancing immediate cost containment with the need to protect essential services, workforce capability, strategic investments, resilience, and future recovery capacity.
Establishing financial recovery controls, monitoring indicators, executive reviews, and escalation mechanisms that support sustainable resource management.
Diagnosing operational bottlenecks, process failures, capacity constraints, productivity gaps, service delays, quality problems, and excessive administrative complexity.
Prioritizing operational interventions according to service criticality, citizen impact, cost, feasibility, dependencies, implementation speed, and potential performance benefits.
Applying process redesign, workflow simplification, lean principles, automation, service standards, capacity management, and operational discipline to restore performance.
Establishing daily, weekly, and monthly management routines that provide visibility of recovery progress and enable rapid resolution of critical operational barriers.
Reviewing institutional mandates, strategic objectives, programmes, initiatives, operating models, and resource commitments to identify misalignment contributing to underperformance.
Separating essential strategic priorities from activities that consume resources without producing sufficient public value or supporting recovery objectives.
Developing a focused recovery agenda with clear priorities, measurable outcomes, accountable owners, resources, dependencies, and realistic implementation horizons.
Establishing mechanisms for periodically reassessing recovery priorities as institutional conditions, risks, stakeholder expectations, and available resources change.
Examining the leadership behaviours required to create urgency, establish direction, make difficult choices, maintain accountability, and sustain confidence during institutional recovery.
Strengthening executive decision-making under pressure by combining evidence, strategic judgment, stakeholder considerations, risk assessment, and implementation realities.
Establishing leadership-team alignment through shared priorities, clear roles, transparent performance expectations, constructive challenge, and disciplined management routines.
Managing leadership credibility during difficult periods through visible action, consistent communication, responsible accountability, transparency, and demonstrated progress.
Assessing workforce capability, leadership capacity, skills gaps, productivity, workload, organizational morale, critical roles, and workforce risks affecting recovery.
Designing workforce interventions involving capability development, role clarification, performance management, redeployment, recruitment, succession, and organizational redesign where appropriate.
Managing resistance, change fatigue, uncertainty, competing interests, and workforce concerns while maintaining service continuity and institutional professionalism.
Building employee engagement around recovery priorities through credible communication, participation, feedback mechanisms, leadership visibility, and recognition of progress.
Establishing turnaround governance structures that clarify executive sponsorship, decision rights, accountability, escalation, programme oversight, and assurance responsibilities.
Designing management controls that provide sufficient oversight of recovery actions without creating excessive bureaucracy, duplicated approvals, or implementation delays.
Integrating risk management, internal audit, performance assurance, programme assurance, compliance, and independent challenge into recovery governance.
Creating transparent accountability mechanisms that track commitments, identify slippage, address unresolved issues, and ensure that corrective actions remain effective.
Using performance analytics, dashboards, process mining, automation, artificial intelligence, and integrated management information to accelerate institutional diagnosis and recovery.
Developing leading indicators that identify emerging performance deterioration before problems become visible through traditional lagging performance measures.
Assessing technology interventions for data quality, interoperability, cybersecurity, privacy, algorithmic bias, implementation feasibility, and long-term sustainability.
Establishing digital performance-monitoring systems that provide executives with timely information about recovery progress, risks, bottlenecks, and emerging opportunities.
Identifying how institutional decline affects citizens, service users, partners, employees, communities, suppliers, regulators, and other important stakeholders.
Prioritizing service-recovery interventions according to citizen impact, service criticality, equity, accessibility, reliability, urgency, and available institutional capacity.
Developing communication strategies that explain recovery priorities, acknowledge performance challenges appropriately, demonstrate progress, and manage stakeholder expectations.
Establishing feedback and experience-monitoring mechanisms that enable leaders to detect whether recovery initiatives are improving actual service outcomes and stakeholder confidence.
Assessing underperforming programmes and projects through scope, benefits, costs, governance, resources, dependencies, risks, delivery capability, and strategic alignment.
Determining whether struggling initiatives should be recovered, redesigned, paused, consolidated, transferred, or discontinued based on evidence and public-value considerations.
Establishing recovery portfolios that prioritize initiatives with the greatest contribution to institutional stabilization, strategic outcomes, service improvement, and sustainable performance.
Strengthening programme governance through stage gates, benefits tracking, milestone management, issue escalation, independent assurance, and executive intervention.
Assessing how fiscal volatility, geopolitical disruption, climate events, demographic changes, technological shifts, and evolving citizen expectations can complicate recovery efforts.
Managing emerging risks involving cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, misinformation, critical digital dependencies, supply-chain disruption, and complex third-party relationships.
Designing recovery strategies that remain resilient when external conditions change rapidly or when initial assumptions about the operating environment prove incorrect.
Building institutional sensing capabilities that allow executives to identify new threats and opportunities early and adjust recovery interventions accordingly.
Developing recovery scorecards that combine financial, operational, workforce, service, strategic, risk, and implementation indicators into an integrated management view.
Establishing leading and lagging measures that reveal whether recovery actions are producing immediate stabilization and sustainable improvement.
Setting thresholds, milestones, escalation triggers, intervention criteria, and management review routines for tracking recovery performance.
Using performance evidence to reallocate resources, adjust interventions, remove barriers, accelerate successful initiatives, and discontinue ineffective actions.
Converting successful turnaround interventions into permanent improvements in governance, processes, capabilities, controls, culture, resource management, and performance systems.
Identifying conditions that could cause performance deterioration to recur and establishing preventive controls, early-warning indicators, ownership, and institutional learning mechanisms.
Strengthening resilience by developing contingency capabilities, critical dependencies, workforce depth, financial flexibility, technology resilience, and service continuity arrangements.
Embedding continuous improvement so that recovery becomes a platform for sustained institutional effectiveness rather than a temporary response to organizational distress.
Conducting an integrated institutional turnaround diagnostic covering strategy, governance, finance, operations, workforce, technology, risk, service delivery, and organizational health.
Developing a prioritized recovery plan that identifies root causes, stabilization measures, strategic interventions, accountable owners, resource requirements, and implementation milestones.
Designing an executive recovery dashboard with measurable outcomes, leading indicators, escalation thresholds, risks, dependencies, and mechanisms for tracking sustained improvement.
Presenting a complete institutional recovery roadmap that moves the organization from performance distress toward stability, resilience, operational effectiveness, accountability, and sustainable public value.
Training Approach
This course will be delivered by our skilled trainers who have vast knowledge and experience as expert professionals in the fields. The course is taught in English and through a mix of theory, practical activities, group discussion and case studies. Course manuals and additional training materials will be provided to the participants upon completion of the training.
Tailor-Made Course
This course can also be tailor-made to meet organization requirement. For further inquiries, please contact us on: Email: training@upskilldevelopment.com Tel: +254 721 331 808
Training Venue
The training will be held at our Upskill Training Centre. We also offer training for a group (at a discount of 10% to 50%) at requested location all over the world. The Onsite course fee covers the course tuition, training materials, two break refreshments, buffet lunch, airport transfers, Upskill gift package, and guided tour.
Visa application, travel expenses, dinners, accommodation, insurance, and other personal expenses are catered by the participant
Certification
Participants will be issued with Upskill certificate upon completion of this course.
Airport Pickup and Accommodation
Airport pickup and accommodation is arranged upon request. For booking contact our Training Coordinator through Email: training@upskilldevelopment.com, +254 721 331 808
Terms of Payment:
Unless otherwise agreed between the two parties’ payment of the course fee should be done 3 working days before commencement of the training so as to enable us to prepare better.
| Training Mode | Platform | Fee | Enroll |
|---|---|---|---|
| Online Training | Zoom/ Google Meet | 1,740USD | Register |
| Course Date | Location | Fee | Enroll |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2026 to 18/09/2026 | Nairobi | 2,900 USD | Register |
| 07/09/2026 to 18/09/2026 | Mombasa | 3,400 USD | Register |
| 05/10/2026 to 16/10/2026 | Nairobi | 2,900 USD | Register |
| 02/11/2026 to 13/11/2026 | Mombasa | 3,400 USD | Register |
| 02/11/2026 to 13/11/2026 | Nairobi | 2,900 USD | Register |
| 07/12/2026 to 18/12/2026 | Nairobi | 2,900 USD | Register |
| 07/12/2026 to 18/12/2026 | Mombasa | 3,400 USD | Register |
We support the development of a skilled and confident workforce to meet the changing demands of growing sectors by offering the best possible training to enable them to fulfil learning goals.
Make a Mark in You Day to Day work